World_news Chris Wallace’s adversarial relationship with Donald Trump, explained –


President Donald Trump expects complete loyalty from Fox News.Fox News Sundayhost Chris Wallace is the rare personality on the network that refuses to give it to him.

That’s the crux of the dynamic underpinning the first presidential debate of the 2020 general election, which will be held on Tuesday night at 9 pm ET at Case Western University and the Cleveland Clinic in Cleveland, Ohio, and is set to be moderated by Wallace.

Topics for the debate, which were selected by Wallace and announced by the nonpartisan Commission on Presidential Debates last week, are set to include Trump’s and Biden’s records, the Supreme Court,Covid-19, the economy, “Race and Violence in Our Cities,” and election integrity. Some progressives took umbrage with the fact that climate change was not included.

Wondering how I’m going to explain to my kids in 30 years why climate change wasn’t even a topic in the first 2020 debate but “Race and Violence in our cities” was

— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes)September 24, 2020

Wallace also drew criticism for saying during a Fox News appearance on Sunday that he doesn’t plan to vigorously fact-check the torrent of false claims likely to be made by Trump.

“My job is to be as invisible as possible,” Wallace said. “I’m trying to get them to engage, to focus on the key issues, to give people at home a sense of, ‘Why I want to vote for one versus the other.’”

Wallace stands out as one of the few Fox News personalities who isn’t reflexively pro-Trump

The topic choices and his laissez-faire stance on fact-checking may reflect the fact that while he has more credibility with the center and left than perhaps anyone else who works for Fox, Wallace still works for a network that has always skewed to the right — and that has, in recent years, established itself as something akin to aTrump propaganda organ.

Fox News is America’s top-rated cable news network, and the vast majority of its programming is favorable to Trump — sometimes to an absurd degree. On Monday morning, for instance, the networktotally burieda New York Timesbombshell storyabout Trumppaying next to nothingin federal taxes over a 15-year period, and instead gave Donald Trump Jr. and White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany time onFox & Friendsto blast the story as a political hit job (without presenting any evidence contradicting its conclusions).

For Trump, however, even that isn’t enough. He regularly lashes out at Fox News segments that dare to criticize him or that try to hold people in his orbit to account. He’s even gone as far as to repeatedlyattack Fox News for not rigging its polls— ones that have consistently shown Joe Biden ahead of him — in his favor.

Wallace, son of legendary newsman Mike Wallace, is nobody’s idea of a far-left liberal, but his willingness to ask tough questions and push back on Republicans sets him apart from the Sean Hannitys and Brian Kilmeades of the world — and has made him a target of the president’s ire.

Just watched Mike Wallace wannabe, Chris Wallace, on@FoxNews. I am now convinced that he is even worse than Sleepy Eyes Chuck Todd of Meet the Press(please!), or the people over at Deface the Nation. What the hell is happening to@FoxNews. It’s a whole new ballgame over there!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)April 12, 2020

Perhaps in an effort to manage expectations, Trump went as far as to ludicrously claim Wallace is “controlled by the radical left” during an interview last week onFox & Friendsco-host Brian Kilmeade’s radio show.

“He’ll ask me tough questions and it’ll be unfair, I have no doubt about it,” Trump said. “But he’ll be controlled by the radical left. They control him.”

That claim is obviously absurd. Wallace has beensharply critical of Democratsduring the Trump era, includingincluding Biden, whose campaign has apparentlyrefused Wallace’s requestsfor Biden to be interviewed on his Sunday show. But Trump’s comments indicate he’s concerned Tuesday’s debate could turn out like his most recent tangle with Wallace.

Trump’s most recent interview with Wallace was a disaster

The backdrop for Tuesday’s debate is the interview Trump did with Wallace for the July 19 installment ofFox News Sunday— one that’s perhaps best remembered for Wallace’s pushback when Trump bragged about his performance on a cognitive test he took during his unplanned November 2019 trip to Walter Reed hospital.

“I took the [cognitive] test too, when I heard you passed it. It’s not the hardest test. It shows a picture and it says, ‘what’s that,’ and it’s an elephant,” Wallace said at one point, leaving Trump stammering.

“I took the [cognitive] test too, when I heard you passed it. It’s not the hardest test. It shows a picture and it says, ‘what’s that,’ and it’s an elephant.” — Chris Wallace pushes back on Trump hyping the cognitive test he passed at Walter

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar)July 19, 2020

Wallace made points on more substantial topics as well. During an exchange about the coronavirus, he grilled Trump about the fact that, at the time, about 1,000 Americans were dying each day from Covid-19, prompting Trump to say, memorably (and regrettably for all involved), “It is what it is.”

Those exchanges demonstrated that Wallace isn’t afraid of Trump. But at other points, Wallace making room for the president to rant was enough for Trump to get himself in hot water. At various points during the interview, Trump defended the Confederacy, promised a comprehensive health care plan “within two weeks” that still hasn’t been produced more than two months later, and went on a bizarre tangent about how he was “very unfairly treated” in response to a softball question about how he’ll remember his years as president.

WALLACE: “How will you regard your years as POTUS?”

TRUMP: “I think I was very unfairly treated.”

WALLACE: “But what about the good parts?”

TRUMP: “I have done more than any POTUS in history in the first 3.5 years … here’s the bottom line: I’ve been very unfairly treated.”

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar)July 19, 2020

The interview was clearly a disaster for Trump, but he tried to put a good face on it anyway,tweetingafterward, “We may have set a record for doing such an interview in the heat. It was 100 degrees, making things very interesting!”

It’s not like Wallace singled out Trump. In recent months, he’s conducted hard-hitting interviews with Trump campaign officials and administration officials. He’s also offered commentary that’s deeply critical of the Trump White House, including during last year’s impeachment saga when he characterized Trumpworld’s spin of a whistleblower complaint about Trump’s dealings with Ukraine as “astonishing and I think deeply misleading.”

Here’s Fox News’ Chris Wallace saying that “the spinning that’s been done by the president’s defenders over the last 24 hours since this very damaging whistleblower complaint came out … [is] not surprising but it is astonishing and I think deeply misleading.”

— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar)September 27, 2019

Perhaps even more unforgivably from Trump’s perspective, Wallace has also at times praised Joe Biden. On Fox News, Wallace praised Biden’s Democratic National Convention-closing speech as “enormously effective,” adding, “remember, Donald Trump has been talking for months about Joe Biden as mentally shot … I thought that he blew a hole, a big hole in the characterization.”

As he’s wont to do, Trumpfired backdays later by describing Wallace at a rally as someone “who has always wanted to be his father but it never worked out because of a lack of talent.”

The first debate should be good TV, but it might not be much more than that

Tuesday will not be Wallace’s debut as a presidential debate moderator; he also handled the third debate between Trump and Hillary Clinton in 2016.

In a demonstration of how similar today’s Trump scandals are to ones that dominated the last presidential campaign, arguably the biggest headline coming out of that event was Trump’s refusal to commit to accepting the results of the election if he lost.

“I will keep you in suspense,” he said, in comments that presaged his currentrefusal to commit to a peaceful transfer of powerif he loses in November.

But Wallace was also hard on Clinton, at one point grilling her about paid speeches she gave to banking groups.

It’s hard to remember now, but Clinton was widely regarded as besting Trump in all three debates. That wasn’t enough, however, to prevent her from being defeated in the Electoral College.

It’s similarly unlikely that this year’s debates will have a decisive impact on the outcome. A recent Wall Street Journal/NBCpollindicated that more than 70 percent of Americans say the debates won’t matter much to them, with 44 percent reporting it will not matter at all to their choice of who they vote for — a record high dating back to 2000.

Trump has eschewed the debate preparation typically done by candidates. While Biden has reportedly prepared rigorously withmock debates, Trump has instead participated inmore casual sessionswith his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. The president also, according toCBS News, views a recent town hall — one that sawTrump struggling to answer tough questionsfrom a wide variety of citizens — as practice.

“The president prepares by being president,” Tim Murtaugh, the Trump campaign’s director of communications, told CBS News. “And by regularly facing hostile news media. That’s pretty good practice by any measure.”

But even a good performance by the president is unlikely to alter his standing in the race. Polling has shown that Biden’s national lead over Trump has held remarkably steady since last winter at somewhere between 7 and 10 percentage points, even through the coronavirus pandemic and one Trump scandal after the next. Nothing that happens at the first debate is likely to change that. But it should, at least, be good TV.

Will you help keep Vox free for all?

The United States is in the middle of one of the most consequential presidential elections of our lifetimes. It’s essential that all Americans are able to access clear, concise information on what the outcome of the election could mean for their lives, and the lives of their families and communities. That is our mission at Vox. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work. If you have already contributed, thank you. If you haven’t, please consider helping everyone understand this presidential election:Contribute today from as little as $3.

Read More